IGN’s Best of CES 2010 Awards: gear.ign.com Vote TYT everyday through 1/15/10 @ streamy.org: tinyurl.com Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com Check Out TYT Interviews www.youtube.com Watch more at www.theyoungturks.com
Well thats the question that has been argued about for hundreds of years, what is art.
“art without meaning, is entertainment at best” is usually a good rule of thumb.
but there again, art is what a art critic thinks is art, there is no room for interpretation really in art, when creating art you must be a facist.
But if you have been to the art galleries ive been to in around 13 countries, some of which i travel to that country just for the galleries.
What video games are that moving that you really care about the characters, and are on the verge of crying, like you would with a sad film, and if you mention Metal Gear 3: Snake eater, as my friends have, its moving in the same way the last scene of Armageddon is moving.
And i understand that games are great, i bloody love em, but my point is they are not “art”, read the last sentence of the last comment.
and to some extent they are important, WW2 games i think are sometimes educational.
well, die hard 3 is also entertainment, that doesn’t mean that movies are not an art form, it depends on a game. Another World is a modern masterpiece for instance, and storylines of certain games move people more than any classical work of art. games are most certainly part of contemporary art relevant to our time
Im not saying it doesnt take alot to make a game, from programming, to set design, and just all round creative direction they require.
But id say most defietly they probably will be considered “art” as their image improves, take MGS4, or GTA4, they look spectaculor, absoloutly incredible, from each stage of development they took years and years.
but at the end of that, what they have made is entertainment.
“Art without meaning, is entertainment at best”
It takes a lot of art to make a game, and any game artist will say, that the entire game they work on, is their art. Same with programmers. Math and programs are a form of art, but not a visual one. So pretty much… an entire game is a piece of art, music, workings, and what you see…
Nope, there not, there a form of entertainment.
i think they have the potential in the future to be considered an art form.
but games like GTA, MGS4, Saints Row, CoD. are most definetly not art…
they are entertainment.
Yeah I dont always check my Email every day, I have a life.
And u keep spewing nonsense, fact remains, there is no 3D tv without glasses of some form. U can cry and bitch and fling ur insults, but it doesnt change the fact that I was right all along, and u are just wrong.
Again, u NEED to read the fineprint, Intel is releasing a TV that ONLY NEEDS THE PAPER THIN GLASSES. Not a Glass-less 3d. Sorry for making a fool of u.
Oh and I dont read through old comments, I read my email. I guess technology isnt ur strong point huh…
I also think that wearing those 3D glasses makes you look like a tool. And I hate wearing eye-glasses over eye-glasses like I have to do when wearing sun glasses…So the 3D glasses concept isn’t going to do it for me…
Can I say geeks? no? ok DORKS!! hahahaha classic
Well thats the question that has been argued about for hundreds of years, what is art.
“art without meaning, is entertainment at best” is usually a good rule of thumb.
but there again, art is what a art critic thinks is art, there is no room for interpretation really in art, when creating art you must be a facist.
But if you have been to the art galleries ive been to in around 13 countries, some of which i travel to that country just for the galleries.
well i guess you don’t get art, but it’s ok you don’t have to, i understand
What video games are that moving that you really care about the characters, and are on the verge of crying, like you would with a sad film, and if you mention Metal Gear 3: Snake eater, as my friends have, its moving in the same way the last scene of Armageddon is moving.
And i understand that games are great, i bloody love em, but my point is they are not “art”, read the last sentence of the last comment.
and to some extent they are important, WW2 games i think are sometimes educational.
well, die hard 3 is also entertainment, that doesn’t mean that movies are not an art form, it depends on a game. Another World is a modern masterpiece for instance, and storylines of certain games move people more than any classical work of art. games are most certainly part of contemporary art relevant to our time
scott lowe is cute <3
Im not saying it doesnt take alot to make a game, from programming, to set design, and just all round creative direction they require.
But id say most defietly they probably will be considered “art” as their image improves, take MGS4, or GTA4, they look spectaculor, absoloutly incredible, from each stage of development they took years and years.
but at the end of that, what they have made is entertainment.
“Art without meaning, is entertainment at best”
learn to spell and fuck off man “seriously” fuck off
@nekineki no they aren’t
incorrect, they are art…
It takes a lot of art to make a game, and any game artist will say, that the entire game they work on, is their art. Same with programmers. Math and programs are a form of art, but not a visual one. So pretty much… an entire game is a piece of art, music, workings, and what you see…
fucktard fucktard fucktard…. come on dude, seruisly? ur the fucktard
the anchorman is fake he has an earbud in his ear1
Nope, there not, there a form of entertainment.
i think they have the potential in the future to be considered an art form.
but games like GTA, MGS4, Saints Row, CoD. are most definetly not art…
they are entertainment.
games are an art form
Yeah I dont always check my Email every day, I have a life.
And u keep spewing nonsense, fact remains, there is no 3D tv without glasses of some form. U can cry and bitch and fling ur insults, but it doesnt change the fact that I was right all along, and u are just wrong.
but you replied to me first 3 days after i put the first comment you fuktard
you forgot about intels keynote speech fuktard and im no fool fucktard
Again, u NEED to read the fineprint, Intel is releasing a TV that ONLY NEEDS THE PAPER THIN GLASSES. Not a Glass-less 3d. Sorry for making a fool of u.
Oh and I dont read through old comments, I read my email. I guess technology isnt ur strong point huh…
geek and dork? look what your dumb ass is doing, making fucking videos on youtube.
lol is it spelled with an i?
The host is kinda dumb…
pm me for lockerz invite
Hey guys visit my channel for gimp? and photoshop tutorials…please subscribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
herpies: hahahahaha lol can you sub and add me
This host seems like a douchebag.
I also think that wearing those 3D glasses makes you look like a tool. And I hate wearing eye-glasses over eye-glasses like I have to do when wearing sun glasses…So the 3D glasses concept isn’t going to do it for me…
what happens in vegas stays in vegas, herpes dont!